Is "girl on girl" action really more appealing?

there are many theories as to why the sight of women making out is more appealing.  one is that back before civilization, men are more likely to have multiple partners to increase the chance of pregnancy and birth, so much that women who live together tend to have their menstrual cycles synchronize (you can look this up).  So having sexually available women together doing sexual things, like making out, increases the likelihood of copulation.  back in those days, anyways.

here's another one:  women are creatures of mystery.  as many of you know, it's really hard for men to figure out how to pleasure them.  their organs are internal, and full of mystery.  this is also one of the theories as to why some men like ladyboys and futanari, and don't consider themselves homosexual for it. penises are easy to understand.  erect when they're aroused, rub it for pleasure, ejaculate when there's an orgasm.  vaginas are full of mystery, and so much harder to understand.  however, the theory is that because women have the same genitals as each other, they should understand how to pleasure each other more.  this, coupled with the fact that women are allowed to be more casually intimate with each other (free to hug, cuddle, sleep in the same bed) without the stigma that modern society still, unfortunately, places upon homosexuality, only makes it more appealing for men.

 

finally, women are creatures of beauty, full of soft curves and roundness, where as men are hairy, awkward things with rough edges and appendages pointing in different directions.  women can look beautiful and gorgeous in one minute, cute and darling in the next, then sexy and attractive in another. in terms of general aesthetics, it's usually more appealing to see women making out than seeing this, although, to each their own, right?. 

maybe next time i'll consider the appeal of two men making out.  in the meanwhile, don't be shy and give some feedback!  we don't have to agree :)